Frontend verification evidence¶
Implementation review on 2026-11-09. This report covers static applications, disposable browser fixtures and focused backend tests. It does not certify a production deployment or integration with the unavailable Product/Exchange images.
Automated checks¶
| Check | Observed result |
|---|---|
| All three frontends | Formatting, ESLint, TypeScript, five Vitest tests per app and static export passed |
| Local pre-commit hooks | Formatting, lint, types and unit/contract tests passed in each frontend |
| Docker | All three Dockerfiles built successfully; fixture Compose serves /, /store/, /admin/ and /api/ on localhost:8081 |
| Local proxy | nginx -t passed; Docker DNS resolution was added after rebuilding exposed stale upstream addresses; privacy routing and logo retrieval passed after correction |
| Gateway | ./mvnw -B -Djava.version=24 verify: eight tests passed, including the real CSRF cookie/header exchange, HttpOnly login cookie and profile lookup; configured coverage threshold passed |
| Account | ./mvnw -B -Djava.version=24 verify: four tests passed; own profile, restricted account reads/deletes and administrator deletion guard covered; configured coverage threshold passed |
| Runtime package audit | npm audit --omit=dev --audit-level=moderate passed with no production dependency findings |
| Full package audit | Eight moderate development-tool findings remain through ESLint's minimatch dependency; see dependencies |
Java's normal repository target remains 25. Local backend checks explicitly used the installed JDK 24 override. Maven compilation and repository coverage checks are the existing backend checks; no formatter or pre-commit configuration is present in those repositories. No new Java dependency was introduced.
Browser CI uses Chromium desktop and Pixel 5 profiles against exported files and explicit API fixtures. See the review-branch workflow runs for exact results. Local interactive checks below used the in-app browser rather than claiming that a locally unavailable Playwright browser installation ran.
| Repository | Review commit | Passing frontend CI |
|---|---|---|
| Landing | 18eb438 |
4 browser cases and 5 unit tests |
| Store | ecbf084 |
8 browser cases and 5 unit tests |
| Admin | 3aeeb18 |
4 browser cases and 5 unit tests |
| Gateway | 70c7325 |
Java 25 tests, coverage and CodeQL passed |
| Account | edb0d71 |
Java 25 tests, coverage and CodeQL passed |
The linked runs exercise the final pinned application commits. The store suite includes desktop/mobile two-tab sign-out regression coverage: active queries reset and the other tab stops displaying the old private profile.
The first landing/store CI run exposed an ambiguous alert locator caused by Next.js route announcements. The tests were scoped to application feedback without removing assertions; the full relevant workflows then passed. All 15 application routes returned HTTP 200 through the final local proxy. Store manifest scope/start URL and all page titles were also checked there. The documentation build completed with no issues and both Compose files passed configuration validation. Backend automation initializes only backend submodules so private frontend checkout does not break the public platform checks.
Platform Java/Compose integration
and Java/Actions CodeQL
passed after correcting workflow YAML, the checkout working directory and the
Java analysis toolchain. The isolated platform review excludes pre-existing
local infrastructure commits; those remain on feature/frontend-applications-workspace.
The private frontend CodeQL queries ran, but GitHub rejected result uploads
because Advanced Security is not enabled. The owner explicitly chose to keep
the repositories private and configure this later. Private CodeQL is therefore
opt-in via the repository variable ENABLE_CODEQL=true after the entitlement
and scanning setup are enabled. A skipped job does not establish a clean scan.
Automatic build/type/unit/browser checks remain enabled.
Coordinated draft reviews: platform #6, landing #1, store #1, admin #1, gateway #3, account #3 and organization profile #2.
Interactive browser record¶
The earlier temporary export preview used localhost:4173; the final Docker preview uses localhost:8081. Both expose explicitly labeled disposable fixtures. Observed actions below describe the shipped control patterns; repeated product cards share the same components. Fixtures are never evidence of real backend security, persistence or authorization.
| Control or route | Observed behavior |
|---|---|
| Landing catalog CTA | Opened /store/ with the shared mock-store notice |
| Product preview/detail links | Opened the runtime-ID product page with name, unit and USD price |
| Catalog search | Searching coffee reduced the visible products; clearing restored the catalog |
| Catalog sort | Price ascending reordered the fixture catalog from $3.25 through $12.00 |
| Add to demo cart | Updated the cart count and showed confirmation |
| Product quantity | Zero disabled Add; one enabled it; helper text showed the supported range |
| Cart quantity and reload | Updating to two coffee bags showed $17.00; a reload preserved the selection |
| Cart Remove | Removed the last line and displayed the empty-cart catalog link |
| Guest checkout | Showed sign-in requirement and preserved the checkout return path |
| Empty login | Showed email/password validation, with the first invalid field focused |
| Fixture sign-in | Visitor credentials opened checkout; administrator fixture credentials enabled the admin area |
| Demo order submit | Disabled while pending, opened order details and stated no payment and no shipment |
| Order history/detail | Displayed the created fixture order with total and timestamp |
| Account and sign-out | Showed own profile; sign-out returned to sign-in and removed authenticated navigation |
| Registration | Empty submission showed validation; fictitious fixture inputs completed registration/login and opened the catalog |
| Admin as ordinary user | Displayed administrator-only denial without product mutation controls |
| Admin overview | Displayed API-derived product/account counts and working management links |
| Product Create dialog | Opened, validated missing fields, created a disposable fixture product and refreshed the table |
| Product search | Located the newly created fixture product; no-match state displayed after removal |
| Product Delete | Opened confirmation; Cancel preserved the row; confirming removed only the disposable test product |
| Admin sorting | USD price header reordered rows and displayed the descending direction |
| Admin pagination | One-page fixture data disabled both boundaries; TanStack supplies the row/page model |
| Account details | Opened the read-only detail dialog and closed it without mutations |
| Observability | Displayed honest unconfigured messages in place of dead dashboard buttons |
| Privacy control | Displayed browser opt-out confirmation after disabling optional analytics |
| Mobile navigation | Opened and closed; Escape dismissed the drawer and returned focus to its trigger |
| Keyboard skip link | Tab then Enter moved to the main-content anchor |
| Theme selector | System, Light and Dark changed the actual surfaces and text; screenshots inspected in both themes |
| Missing product and Retry | Displayed a useful 404 message; Retry repeated the request and preserved safe feedback |
| Missing page | Served the zone's custom 404; its catalog link recovered to /store/ |
| Cross-zone home/privacy links | Loaded the correct independent application after the local proxy correction |
| Browser logs | Final admin inspection returned no warnings or errors; intentional missing-product/page requests were exercised separately |
At a 390px viewport the final product page measured document width 375px, below viewport width; catalog and admin account views also had no page overflow. At 1280px the landing measured 1265px document width. Admin tables use an explicit contained horizontal scroll region for wide columns rather than expanding the page. Temporary viewport overrides were reset after checking.
Contrast and source inspection¶
The standard sRGB luminance calculation on the actual theme tokens produced:
| Text/background | Light ratio | Dark ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Primary text / page | 13.74:1 | 15.50:1 |
| Secondary text / page | 5.55:1 | 9.26:1 |
| Accent / page | 6.24:1 | 8.72:1 |
| Placeholder text / product tile | 4.83:1 | 6.49:1 |
| Primary button label / fill | 6.80:1 | 10.54:1 |
MUI owns validation, focusable selects, dialog behavior and disabled states. Source inspection confirms 44px minimum MUI buttons/inputs, a visible focus outline, semantic links/buttons, labeled fields, image dimensions/alt text, one primary heading per screen, page titles, landmarks, English document language, unrestricted zoom and reduced-motion CSS. There is no hero bitmap, autoplay media or third-party blocking script. Faro is lazy-loaded; Umami loads after interaction readiness with automatic page tracking disabled.
antislop delivery gate¶
The following is an implementation review, with evidence above and design reasons in design direction. PASS describes the inspected local UI, not the separate production acceptance items below. Rule identifiers refer to the owner-requested core guide.
Hard requirements¶
| Item | Result and evidence |
|---|---|
| R-02 | PASS: new frontend copy/source and documentation scanned for the prohibited punctuation character |
| R-03 | PASS: measured mobile views fit the viewport; source uses responsive columns, contained tables and 44px MUI controls |
| R-17 | PASS: prices/counts come from API responses; local fixture origin is visibly disclosed |
| R-18 | PASS: no review/testimonial or fictional-team section exists |
| R-23 | PASS: existing project mark is reused; missing imagery is explicitly labeled; no invented portrait/photo asset |
| R-24 | PASS: navigation targets correspond to exported pages or the existing project documentation/source organization |
| R-25 | PASS: theme-token calculations above exceed normal-text AA; both themes visually inspected |
| R-26 | PASS: the browser record covers navigation, search, ordering, forms, dialogs, theme and privacy controls; absent integrations show messages |
| R-27 | PASS: loading/failure/empty components are wired into reads; cart empty, 404, validation and access-denied states were exercised |
| R-28 | PASS: no FAQ is fabricated |
| R-32 | PASS: keyboard skip, focus styling and Escape drawer handling checked; controls use native/MUI keyboard behavior |
| R-33 | PASS: UI changes reside directly in maintained TSX/CSS; no runtime source-rewriting helper ships |
| R-34 | PASS: Light and Dark surfaces, product views and admin controls were inspected in the running applications |
| R-35 | PASS: static and Docker builds passed; control-pattern observations and browser log inspection are recorded above |
| R-36 | PASS: no customer, speed, compliance or revenue promise is displayed |
| R-37 | PASS: English/shared-brand brief, authorized defaults, reference research and explicit dials were established before implementation |
| R-38 | PASS: unavailable product media and disposable fixtures identify themselves; unsupported workflows are absent |
| R-39 | PASS: source and browser snapshots show semantic controls, labels, landmarks, names, state feedback and reduced-motion handling |
| R-40 | PASS: media space is dimensioned and optional scripts are deferred; no unmeasured performance result is claimed |
Purpose review¶
| Item | Result and evidence |
|---|---|
| R-01 | PASS: paper/ink/rust separates reading surfaces from actions; no gradient treatment |
| R-04 | PASS: menu/theme icons identify specific controls; no decorative feature-icon collection |
| R-06 | PASS: system sans keeps controls readable; Georgia distinguishes editorial/product headings |
| R-07 | PASS: no background pattern or blueprint decoration |
| R-08 | PASS: CTA copy names the action without decorative arrow repetition |
| R-09 | PASS: section labels identify demo/catalog context without invented promotional badges |
| R-10 | PASS: no glass/backdrop-blur stack |
| R-12 | PASS: ordinary surfaces use borders; MUI overlays use elevation for layering |
| R-13 | PASS: no glow treatment |
| R-14 | PASS: product repetition supports comparing fields; explanatory content uses a different composition |
| R-19 | PASS: restrained interaction feedback matches MOTION 1; reduced-motion rules stop transitions |
| R-22 | PASS: no unrelated stock illustration; product-media absence is explicit |
Identity review¶
| Item | Result and evidence |
|---|---|
| Dials | PASS: landing/store 2/2/1, admin 1/1/1, documented before building |
| Dial consistency | PASS: editorial landing varies content density; admin preserves stable repeated-task layout |
| Focal point | PASS: primary heading/action anchors each reviewed screen |
| Spacing | PASS: hero, catalog and explanations have different purposeful density |
| Accent | PASS: rust marks actions/context, with neutral reading and table surfaces |
| Motif | PASS: recurring editorial type and the existing 52 identity connect the three zones |
| Design read | PASS: educational audience and catalog direction recorded in the design document |
Craft and consistency review¶
| Item | Result and evidence |
|---|---|
| C-1 | PASS: palette, type, layout, media and motion each have recorded reasons |
| C-2 | PASS: interactive outcomes are recorded above; unavailable dashboards have no fake controls |
| C-3 | PASS: sections explain or demonstrate browsing and simulated orders |
| C-4 | PASS: mobile, themes and error/access/empty flows exercised, with remaining integration boundaries disclosed |
| C-5 | PASS: mock-store and fixture notices remain visible throughout |
| R-05 | PASS: content sequence follows catalog learning; no pricing tiers, testimonial bar or template FAQ |
| R-11 | PASS: 6px controls/panels and 4px media tiles provide restrained radius variation |
| R-15 | PASS: actions name browsing, cart changes or demo-order creation |
| R-16 | PASS: copy describes actual behavior rather than marketing superlatives |
| R-20 | PASS: editorial catalog composition and warm palette persist independently of the logo |
| R-21 | PASS: system preference plus working Light/Dark options is implemented |
| R-29 | PASS: neutral surfaces and one rust accent form the active palette |
| R-30 | PASS: references informed hierarchy; no external template source or brand assets copied |
| R-31 | PASS: one-line major design rationales are recorded in the design document |
Production acceptance still required¶
- Real Product/Exchange contract and authorization testing, plus full-stack order persistence/ownership checks. The fixture server does not prove these.
- Owner-selected CDN provider, same-domain path origins, TLS/API cookie rules, per-app build variables and rollback policy. Ask before deploying.
- Faro/Umami hosting, collection policy and actual payload inspection against configured collectors. Collection is disabled by default today.
- Device-specific PWA installation acceptance. The store manifest and icon export exist; the app is online-only and private/API data is not cached offline.
- Lighthouse, field Web Vitals, exhaustive assistive-technology audit and load testing: not measured. No corresponding score or performance claim is made.
The frontend branches contain AI-assisted implementation and documentation. Keep course delivery evidence and human review with the eventual release.